![]() It became Sound Tools in 1989, and was renamed Pro Tools in 1991. The following year – 1985 – they were offering downloadable features for the software. ![]() Pro Tool first appeared as Sound Designer, created by two Berkeley graduates in 1984. Pro Tools is celebrating its 30th birthday this year, so happy birthday to you! It’s for people who need to know a little bit what they’re doing.īottom Line Up Front Summary: If you are just getting started with DAW tools, I’d recommend starting with the more user friendly Pro Tools here. If you’ve been looking to invest in some software for recording music, you’ve unquestionably encountered these two names.īoth do similar things, both have great respect in audio engineering circles, and both cross the line from hobbyist software into something a little bit more serious.Īs far as recording software goes, this is premium level stuff. And today, we’re going to look at a couple of the long-standing stalwarts of digital music production: Logic Pro and Pro Tools. We’re here to try and help you with that. The Full Fender Hot Rod Deluxe Review You’ll Love - January 4, 2022Īs the DAW market continues to expand, and the tools available for home recording enthusiasts become more accessible, it’s easy to be overwhelmed by the number of options available.5 Best Guitars for Small Hands Guide - January 10, 2022.Logic Pro vs Pro Tools: Which is the Best DAW for You? – Updated May 2022 - May 9, 2022.I'd hate to go back now, and that's the same with music software. Then one day I made the effort to really spend time learning Photoshop and I realised how good it was, and so much more competent at doing the job than the one I used. I tried a trial of photoshop and hated it - far too complicated. For many years I convinced myself Photoshop was OTT and my cheaper software was just as good. Garageband is great for starting your computer music experience, but it makes things simpler than Logic, Cubase and the other more versatile platforms. I expect I use 10% of the feature set, based on dropdowns I've never used, but I bet MY 10% is different from somebody else's - that's the benefit of more advanced (not better) software. Nowadays, if I want to stack up inserts and sends it never occurs to me that this might be impossible for some software. Do you want the flashy but lovely sounding synths and samples? I constantly discover new features and when you use them wonder how you managed. ![]() If you never find yourself not being able to do something, then you don't need to change. If you keep wishing you could do X, or wishing that doing Y was easier, then a more advanced platform allows you to grow. The real question is that changing your software gives you a very big learning curve to get back to where you were, so are you finding a block to progress? I am not a deep user of Logic Pro X and haven't kept up with GB since switching before the upgrade that made it more like LPX. I didn't drill down in the software instruments but there are definitely more in LCPX.Ĥ. The latest update for LPX has 27k entries in the Loops window, compared to 5.8k in GB. (To me, trying to figure out what I'm missing in GB is the kind of pain I recognize you don't want to go through, but I believe it's a valuable step up.)ģ. You can create a comp in GB, but it's not nearly as seamlessly integrated. The "quick-swipe" feature in "takes" is a big timesaver if you do recording that way. Things like Compressors and Reverb (Space Designer, esp.) have a *lot* of different settings that make audible differences and really show the value of the built-in plugins, and you just don't get to all of those in GB. The ability to "tinker" with all the exposed settings that you don't have access to is one. Depends on the version of GarageBand, but the current version is based on Logic Pro X, so the layout should look familiar, though many things which are "built-in" for GarageBand do get exposed in detail, and require a little more tinkering.Ģ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |